
The Dynamic Tower will be an 80 story building. Plans call for the top 10 floors to be used for luxury style apartments, below which will be another 35 floors of apartment accommodation, followed by hotel rooms, with the 20 lower stories be used as retail space. With the rotation of individual floors occupants and visitors will enjoy a 360 degree view from wherever they choose. According to one designer “It will be continually in motion, changing shape and giving residents the ability to choose a new view at the touch of a button. The form of the building would constantly change as each floor rotates separately giving a new view of the building as it turns.” Rotating Wind Power Tower to begin construction in Dubai Mahesh Basantani;The Tower was designed by David Fisher of Dynamic Architecture, who hopes to be a trend-setter for cities of the future, and is planning to adapt his tower for sites in London and New York. According to Fisher, “Today's life is dynamic, so the space we are living in should be dynamic as well, adjustable to our needs that change continuously, to our concept of design and to our mood, buildings will follow the rhythms of nature, they will change direction and shape from spring to summer, from sunrise to sunset, and adjust themselves to the weather, buildings will be alive….From now on, buildings will have four dimensions, the fourth dimension is ‘Time' to become part of architecture…”
A second Dynamic Architecture tower is set to start construction in Moscow, by the end of 2008. A unique aspect of this first building in motion is in the construction itself; each floor will be prefabricated in a factory in Italy, and then be shipped directly to the site. Dr. Fisher believes that floors will be then able to go up as quickly as one every seven days, allowing for the tower to be built in about 18 months. With the prefabrication of modular structures elsewhere, the core of the tower will be the only piece that needs to be built, conserving on-site workers and pushing more of the construction off-site and into the factories. Fisher believes assembly of the Dynamic Tower will require only 80 technicians, thereby saving tens of millio

While the beauty of such a building along with the functional benefits for anyone wealthy enough to live in one are all arguments in favor of Fisher’s vision, the most striking potential benefit is environmental. The building is designed not only to produce enough power for its own needs, but for surrounding buildings as well. The design will utilize the high winds which surround large structures, as well as the large surface area of the building. The Dynamic Tower is intended to be a true green power plant, using wind-powered turbines as well as photovoltaic cell technology to collect power from sunlight. The tower will be powered by roof solar panels and cells placed on the top surface of each floor, along with 79 wind turbines located between each of the rotating floors, which will be capable of generating 1,200,000 kilowatt-hours of energy from each level. If all goes as planned the building will create 10 times the energy it needs, giving the ability to produce energy for other nearby buildings as well.
While the revolving tower’s creator makes many promises, and there are many people who praise its potential, there are still questions about whether it will deliver. Is the revolving tower even technologically feasible? Will it be killed off by cost overruns and unexpected problems? One major criticism is the expense involved for the first building in Dubai. Some detractors raise the question of whether the tower will benefit only the wealthy. For example, writer Alstair Donald, of Spiked, a self-described "independent online phenomenon dedicated to raising the horizons of humanity by waging a culture war of words against misanthropy, priggishness, prejudice, luddism, illiberalism and irrationalism," calls it “a seven-star hotel compound for the rich serves to magnify the gap between rich and poor; the workers who build these compounds and service their inhabitants are confined to encampments on the edge of the city.” However, the more compelling arguments and criticisms focus less on societal implications and more on feasibility. The implementation of the concept may prove to be much more difficult to achieve. Will a combination of unproven technology and overly ambitious goals render the design unworkable or too costly? David Fisher’s creation is essentially a gigantic machine with innumerable moving parts, and yet he is not expecting anything to go wrong. Critics are quick to point out that he has never designed a skyscraper before, and argue that the as yet untested technology will present insurmountable technical problems. "Dubai 'shape-shifting skyscraper' unveiled"
Will the revolving tower go the way of failed inventions of the past which were acclaimed as the wave of the future? Will the revolving tower become a symbol of complete failure and blind ambition? Or will it be the first building of the world's future? Admittedly, if the critics are correct, many of the technical and engineering aspects of the dynamic tower concept create problems which have apparently not been tested or worked out. However, there is no reason to assume they will be insurmountable, if there are men and women with the vision and the patience to find solutions. Nor is there any reason to believe that even failed attempts at making this idea workable will not inspire others to seeking alternative solutions to accomplish the same goals, including clean low cost energy and self-sufficiency. One thing is certain. We cannot keep doing business as usual as our resources dwindle and global energy demands increase, and mega-cities continue to grow all over the globe. Maybe the Dynamic Tower is an idea whose time has come, and if not, perhaps its vision of environmentally clean and economic energy production will inspire other designs and other technologies which will ultimately help transform the cities of the world to a better future.
2 comments:
This article was excellent, both intriguing and informative. I thought that it brought a topic to the table that everyone should be interested to read, the future of energy and architecture. My mind did not wander at all and the relaxed style of the writing made it feel like you were talking to me.
Additionaly, you provided great counter arguments which really made the post seem unbiased. I found it interesting that the towers are going to be power plants as well as earthquake safe. I personally think that these towers sound like the future of architecture in cities and I am really excited to see the first one go up in the US.
Being an investor there are a lot of positive benefits that I can see to these towers. They serve as a living space, a retail space, and a hotel while also acting as a power plant. I am concerned about global warming and overpopulation and this looks to be the solution to both problems. The vertical expansion takes care of over crowding and the energy production takes away the need for power plants and does so in an environmentally friendly way.
I am really interested to see how this project goes. Do you know if they plan to sell the electricity to the surrounding buildings? That seems like a way they could offset any unseen costs or even decrease the price of rent. It will be interesting to see how these giant machines actually hold. I was also really surprised to see that Moscow plans to put one up, I didn't think they had that kind of money.
There are some areas that you could have chosen better wording and there was an instance when your tense was incorrect when quoting. Other than that this was a great read and I'll be checking back to see what other posts you have.
Post a Comment